Theories Of International Relations 2 Dersi 6. Ünite Sorularla Öğrenelim

Critical Security Studies

1. Soru

What are the new security conceptions and theories on the meaning and nature of security that have emerged in the last couple of decades called?

Cevap

They are called “critical security studies”.


2. Soru

What is the main reason for defining “critical security studies” as ‘critical’?

Cevap

The main reason for defining critical security studies as ‘critical’ is connected to their critiques to traditional security conception’s main assumptions on the meaning of security and subsequent practices of it.


3. Soru

In general terms, what do critical security studies represent?

Cevap

In general terms, critical security studies represent the aggregate amount of different critical perspectives on security.


4. Soru

In what terms do Ken Booth and Richard Wyn Jones criticize the traditional security conception?

Cevap

Ken Booth and Richard Wyn Jones, as two important representatives of the School, not only criticize the traditional security conception in terms of deepening and widening of it, but also argue for reconceptualization of security studies by focusing on emancipation of human beings.


5. Soru

During the last years of the Cold War, in what terms were security studies questioned?

Cevap

During the last years of the Cold War, security studies was not only questioned in terms of the reasons, but also in terms of results.


6. Soru

What are Critical security studies inspired from?

Cevap

Critical security studies are inspired from the Peace Studies that has started to focus on “positive peace” concept in addition to “negative peace” since the 1980s.


7. Soru

Who is Johan Galtung?

Cevap

Johan Galtung is the most prominent representative of Peace Studies.


8. Soru

What does Aberystwyth School give a start to its critics through?

Cevap

Aberystwyth School gives a start to its critics through arguing that state-centric security conception does not generate satisfactory explanations for the post-Cold War’s security environment. In this context, Aberystwyth School questions the narrow, militarized, positivist and theoretically realist security conception.


9. Soru

What are some of the most important characteristics of Aberystwyth School?

Cevap

The most important characteristics of Aberystwyth School can be summarized as follows:

  1. Addressing the security as derivative concept,

  2. Claim for necessity of widening of security agenda,

  3. Privileging of individual as the referent object of security,

  4. Regarding security problematique in the context of emancipation concept,

  5. Considering the threats in a socially constructed manner,

  6. Examining the relationships between self and other


10. Soru

According to Max Horkheimer, what is traditional theory about?

Cevap

According to Max Horkheimer, traditional theory is about the reproduction of status quo.


11. Soru

Where can the theoretical origins of critical security be traced back to?

Cevap

Theoretical origins of critical security can be traced back to Frankfurt School which emerged in Germany after the end of the First World War.


12. Soru

How do classical Marxism and Frankfurt School differ in terms of thoughts on life and mind?

Cevap

While classical Marxism argues that life determines mind, not vice versa, Frankfurt School claims that there is a mutual relationship between mind, thoughts, ideals and economic infrastructure.


13. Soru

What has the introduction of security as an “ambiguous symbol” and an “essentially contested concept” led to?

Cevap

Introduction of security as an “ambiguous symbol” and an “essentially contested concept” has led to emergence of critical security approaches. Because critical security studies reject the idea that security has a constant meaning.


14. Soru

According to Aberystwyth School, what is security?

Cevap

According to Aberystwyth School which makes effort to reveal the limitations of traditional security conception, security is a derivative concept based on a priori political understanding.


15. Soru

Why does Aberystwyth School state that dominant security rhetoric does not deal with the essence of security?

Cevap

Aberystwyth School states that dominant security rhetoric does not deal with the essence of security. Because, narrow security agenda of traditional conception does not analyse the security problems of social groups and individuals.


16. Soru

What are the two main debates in Security Studies during 1990s about?

Cevap

While one of the two main debates in Security Studies during 1990s is about the broadening of security agenda by including the non-military threats, the other one is about determining the proper referent object of security.


17. Soru

Apart from the state, what are defined as potential referent objects of security? 

Cevap

Individuals, collective groups, nations, and as a whole global community are defined as potential referent objects of security apart from the state.


18. Soru

According to Aberystwyth School, what should be at the center of security thinking?

Cevap

According to Aberystwyth School, emancipation should be at the center of security thinking. Ken Booth explains the importance of emancipation concept for security studies in following ways: “Security and emancipation are two sides of the same coin. Emancipation, not power or order, produces true security. Emancipation, theoretically, is security”.


19. Soru

According to Aberystwyth School, what should emancipation be comprehended as?

Cevap

According to Aberystwyth School, emancipation should be comprehended not as a final end, but as a process. In other words, emancipation is not a constant idea or destination, but a direction for a better world order. That is why, emancipation means to resist to oppression, and struggle for a society based on fundamental freedoms, equality, justice, human development and progress.


20. Soru

How does Aberystwyth School analyze the concept of hegemony?

Cevap

Aberystwyth School analyzes the concept of hegemony by giving attention to unequal and hierarchic structure of international system as the sources of insecurity.


Güz Dönemi Ara Sınavı
7 Aralık 2024 Cumartesi
v